So, Thomas Mulcair has two citizenships. One in France, of course the other one in Canada. If he's chosen to lead the NDP, the Socialist, debt incurring, Union and Aboriginal supported (if there's a problem, just throw more money at it), Corporation haters (they want to increase taxes - inhibiting growth - but they disagree), Communism lovers ( they don't like it when others make more, this DOES reduce substantially ANY incentive) Party. I could go on but, I don't like to waste time, as the NDP are born to do wasting tax payer dollars to further embellish their many wrong - headed points.
Back to Mulcair - he doesn't feel it's necessary to renounce his citizenship in France! Shouldn't our P.M. have a committment to this country? Shouldn't he put Canada first? Does his reluctance to renounce his French citizenship, I think this would cause divided loyalties. But, NOOOOO, the NDP say Mulcair would NEVER do that! Yeah, sure he wouldn't (sic). Mulcair should be Canadian. Period. Even though the NDP will NEVER, and I repeat, NEVER form Gov't.
O, lighten up Johnny. People have all kinds of allegiances and sort them out on a case by case basis. We’re husbands, wives, fathers, mothers, children, brothers, sisters, followers of Jesus, followers of Buddha, Muhammad, Oprah. And most politicians are party loyalists too. As long as we know about them before we vote, what do we care? And anyway, people have citizenship so they can travel and work in other countries, and so their children get advantages, etc. No one take national oaths of allegiance seriously.
ReplyDelete